Courage and Consumerism

I could not agree more:

If We Don't Shop, the Terrorists Have Won?

That seems to be the prevailing sentiment within Mumbai's chic boutiques. Buy expensive stuff, or the terrorists have won. Eat in fancy restaurants, or the terrorists have won. Sleep in over-priced hotels, or the terrorists have won. So, we drain our bank accounts on useless crap and--we win?

I get the idea that fear tactics shouldn't break our spirit, yadda yadda, but how has courage suddenly been equated with consumerism?

The terrorists, and, to a less violent degree, the disenfranchised people they claim to represent, take issue with our free-market, unabashedly consumptive lifestyle. But maybe they don't just begrudge us our Louis Vuittons simply out of evil.

As Sameer Reddy points out in his fantastic piece for Newsweek, the deep divide between rich and poor in India (with most of the country's Muslims leaning heavily towards the poor side) is a petrie dish that grows resentment like bacteria. And resentment taken to a bloody extreme leads to violence, such as the kind we experienced last week. So maybe, instead of trying to defeat terrorism by frenetically swiping our credit cards, we could think more about how to close the gap between the have and the have nots, giving more people access to opportunity and bring them into the fold of society? Sure, it may cost us a pair of Jimmy Choos here or a summer home there, but isn't the prospect of world peace worth it?